The idea of an guarantee is simple: for a small fee, all fixes for a period are protected by the shop providing the assistance. These may seem like an eye-catching option; for only a few money monthly, the shop will pay thousands for a prospective fix. Many shops provide guarantees on costly purchases, especially on big-ticket technology. However, there is a revenue reason behind offering these guarantees, and this reason accounts for the reason prolonged guarantees create no sense for the individual.
In an guarantee strategy, for a one-time fee, or a couple of money monthly, the company will pay for fixes to the protected item. Obviously the monthly cost of the strategy, or the strategy in complete is less than an expected fix expenses. This is an eye-catching choice, as fix bills for appliances can be 100s of money, or even require the complete replacement of the product. However the company would not provide these assurance programs at a loss to themselves. On the contrary, they develop the cost of the prospective fixes right into the cost of the strategy sold to the individual.
An example might be the guarantee on a new tv. For a few money monthly, the shop will protect any fixes required by the new tv. But how much should the shop cost for this? To set their cost for the guarantee, the shop determines the normal fix expenses for the tv, adjusted by the chances the tv will need fixes. The resulting cost would be the cost to the shop to fix the normal number of problematic tvs.
For a simple example: suppose this tv would cost on regular $500 complete to fix. Approximately 2% of the protected tvs have a issue monthly. To fix all protected tvs would cost $10 monthly. Hence the shop would have to pay $10 monthly to protect all fixes. All things equal, this would also be the normal cost to the consumer: the cost of a fix, heavy against the probability of a issue occurring.
However, the shop also has a reason to generate income in the process, and they will almost always develop a revenue figure into their cost. If the normal cost of fixes comes to $10 monthly, the shop would cost a premium for their own gain. This is not taken into account in the mathematical derivation of the prolonged warrantys monthly cost. This usually results in the shop asking for more than what it would mathematically cost to fix the tv. By asking for for example $12 monthly for the guarantee, the shop makes $2 monthly per strategy (if the research are accurate). Neglecting expense, this is 20% revenue. Some shops cost as much as 50% or more on prolonged guarantees, all at the clients expense.
While most guarantee programs are designed to cost the individual more in the long-term than they mathematically save, some guarantee programs have other benefits. Repairs for essential items such as vehicles or homes may be too costly at one time, but the individual has no choice but to pay for fixes immediately. If the cost of a fix is more than the individual could afford at once, assurance programs can help spread the cost over several time.